Emergency Wash Project Report
AFRICAN
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
(AYODA)
_____________________________________________________________________________
REPORT
FOR AYODA PD Amendment 2: Emergency WASH response for Cyclone Sagar affected
communities in Awdal region Somaliland
SECOND
AMENDMENT REPORT FOR REHABILITATION OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN GARBODADAR,
GARGAARA & DAMASHA VILLAGES AND HYGIENE & SANITATION PROMOTION TO
AFFECTED COMMUNITIES IN BORAMA AND HARGEISA TOWN (IDPs)
From
24nd November to 13th December 2018
Photo:Hygeine
& Sanitation Promotion awareness in Hargeisa and Borama IDps
Compiled
by
Ziad
Omer Ali
AYODA
Executive director
Borama
Sheikh Osman Zone Sha’ab area
Mobile: +252634457703/4456375
E-mail:
ayoda_org@yahoo.com
A-EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY OF THE PROJECT
1-PROJECT
NAME/TITLE: Emergency
WASH program response for 53,952 Cyclone Sagar affected people in Awdal region
2-OBJECTIVE
OF THE PROJECT:Emergency WASH
program response for cyclone Sagar affected communities in Awdal Region;
Somaliland.
3-RESULTS/OUTPUTS
3.1-Provision of safe water supply in 3 villages
of Awdal region benefiting Cyclone affected communities
3.2-Increased sanitation and hygiene promotion in
15 villages of Awdal region to prevent AWD/Cholera outbreak from 53,952 people
in cyclone affected communities
4-ACTIVITES:
4.1-Emergency Rehabilitation of Water Supply
Systems in Awdal region (Garbadadar, Gargaara & Damasha villages)
4.2-Emergency hygiene and sanitation promotion in
affected communities in Awdal region
4.3-Sanitation and Hygiene promotion of Emergency
affected communities in Borama & Hargeisa towns (IDPs)
1-Introduction
Africa youth development Association (AYODA) in
partnership with UNICEF Wash section and Ministry of Water Development National
and regional officers has been implementing Emergency Wash program response for
53,952 Cyclone Sagar affected people in Awdal region Somaliland. The project
consist of two very important components, 1-Rehabilitation of water supply systems
in Garbodadar, Gargaara and Damasha villages, 2-Emergecny hygiene and
sanitation promotion to affected communities in 15 villages of Awdal region.
The project duration was six months started from 13th June to 13thDecember 2018, in the completion of Emergency Wash program UNICEF wash officers
and AYODA senior and Wash project staff found out other very important
activities to be implemented due to small gaps of the original and second
amendment as well as required emergency response for hygiene and sanitation
condition of four IDP communities in Hargeisa and Borama town. Therefore, to
respond those gaps and needs the second amendment was developed and implemented
by AYODA wash project staff respectively. The second amendment consists of
three parts as explained following pages in this report. Executive director, program manager, Wash and
hygiene officers found out very important gaps, difference for required water
supply materials of the system rehabilitation, required hygiene and sanitation
materials in targeted communities as well as relevant demand for hygiene and
sanitation kits for 50 primary schools in Lughaya, Baki and Borama districts
where Education in emergency project was running by UNICEF and AYODA
organization. As a result to respond identified gaps and demands UNICEF and
AYODA developed and implemented first Amendment of the project document. The
first Amendment consisted two parts as it was in the initial PD as below detailed
report.
Part
one: Rehabilitation of Water Supply Systems in Awdal region
1-
Extension of water system to IDP camps in Garbodadar village
Under the second amendment of AYODA PD it was
identified and agreed to increase 700m extension of water system to IDP camps
in Gabodadar village through excavation, laying and backfilling of 2 UPVC
pipes, 700m distance up to the tank, pipes and fittings were in the site provided
by UNICEF. Then AYODA Wash project staff has carried out properly as it was
planned collaborated with Mayor of Gabodadar Mr Abdi Abdilahi and IDP community
committee. AYODA guided by experienced UNICEF Wash officers have successfully
managed to provide clean water to needy affected IDPs living in Garbodadad
village same as other host communities who are getting sufficient clean water
from rehabilitated water supply system.
Part
two: Sanitation And Hygiene Promotion In Cyclone SAGAR Affected Schools In Awdal
Region
1-Trnasportation
and distribution of hygiene kits from Borama warehouse to 50 primary schools in
Awdal region
Under the second amendment of the Wash program it
was noticed that 50 primary schools affected by Cyclone Sagar in Awdal region
need urgent hygiene and sanitation kits where AYODA and UNICEF education
section has been implementing Education in Emergency. As a result to respond
identified and requested demand AYODA supported by UNICEF Wash section has
transported different hygiene kits from Borama warehouse to 50 primary schools
in Lughaya, Baki and Borama districts and distributed hygiene kits successfully
along with head teachers, teachers and CECs in those primary schools
respectively.
Part
three: Sanitation and hygiene promotion of Emergency affected communities in
Borama and Hargeisa four IDP settlements
1
.Survey and Data collection at Borama and Hargiesa IDP assessing for health,
water and Education status
1.
INTRODUCTION
IDP Profiling survey was conducted in Hargeisa and
Borama by AYODA and UNICEF. The initiative was to survey and profile internally
displaced persons (IDPs) with the aim of providing overall information on IDPs to
inform future interventions, for monitoring purposes, as well as proving
context specific information to facilitate preparation of local assistance to
IDPs. The survey implementation has been guided and monitored by a core group
of AYODA staff, with support from UNICEF.
The survey applied simple random sampling in
defined IDP settlements. Given the nature of these IDP settlements, this
sampling method was found appropriate and sufficient. The sampling was made on
the basis of an estimation of the IDP population in any given settlement. This
estimation, in turn, was based on previous surveys, reports and updates from
agencies operating in the area, and information from local authorities and IDP
settlement leaders. The tools applied were focus group discussions/participatory
assessments and household interviews. Focus group discussions were held with
small groups of selected settlement representatives such as elder, religious
leaders, and settlement management. They served partly as a ‘door opener’ to
the settlements and partly as a way of providing a certain basic knowledge of
the settlement against which the interviewers could assess the information
obtained in the household interviews. This basic knowledge also served as a
simple frame of reference in the subsequent process of data analysis. Household
interviews were considered the most appropriate and effective way of
systematically gathering the type of data wanted for the profiling.
The survey developed a long questionnaire and a
shorter version with a selection of the questions from the long version.
However, it became clear that the long questionnaire took too long time and
discouraged people to take part in the interviews. It was therefore decided the
short questionnaire should be the only one used.
Data from the questionnaires were analyzed and a
report was then been produced on the basis of the raw data. In principle, such
a report lists all the answers provided by the respondents in the household
interviews. Based on the Standard Report, the present profiling report provides
simplified overviews of selected parts of the raw data, makes minimal analyses,
and points to potential fields of interests for further analysis. While this
will be sufficient in some situations, there will in other situations be a need
for more sector-specific in-depth analyses or a need to focus on specific
settlements or sections of the IDP population.
The survey was carried out in two locations: Hargeisa (Nasahablood IDP A
and Nasahablood IDP B) and Borama ( Xadi IDP and Hayayabe IDP). IPD composition
both in Hargeisa and Borama included IDP’s Refugees, and host community.
1.1
Hargeisa
The city of Hargeisa, is a city situated in
the Woqooyi Galbeed region of the self-declared but
internationally unrecognized Republic of
Somaliland in the Horn of
Africa. It
is the capital and largest city of Somaliland.
Hargeisa is located in a mountainous area, in an enclosed valley of the
northwestern Galgodon (Ogo) highlands.
It sits at an elevation of 1,334 meters (4,377 feet) above sea level. Approximately
the city population is estimated at 1
million to 1.3 million inhabitants. It is the 700th largest city in the world
by population size. The urban area occupies 75 square kilometres
(29 sq mi), with a population density of 12,600 inhabitants per
square kilometre (33,000/sq mi).
1.2
Borama
Borama the capital and the largest city of
the northwestern Awdal region of Somaliland.
The commercial seat of the province, it is situated near the border with Ethiopia.
Approximately the city population is estimated around 400,000 to 600,000
inhabitants making it one of the second largest cities inside Somaliland. It
has been a leading example in community organizing, having been the first area
in Somaliland to adopt a self-help scheme in the wake of the civil war. Borama
is situated in a mountainous and hilly area. It has green meadows and fields, and represents a key focal point for
wildlife. The town's unusual fertility and greenery in the largely arid
countryside has attracted many fauna, such as gazelles, birds and camels.
2
HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITIONS AND HOUSING
2.1
Age and gender distribution
There are relatively high numbers of people in the
35-60-year column and is due to the simple fact that this age category covers
more years than any of the others. Gender distribution is almost equal with
50.5% female and 49.5% male. Gender breakdown by age category and settlement is
available in the Standard Report.
2.2
Number of persons per household
The average number of persons per household is
higher than the number of 6.0-7.0 which many agencies work with. The survey
staff do not actually count the persons in the households but only note the
numbers given by the respondents.
2.3
Housing units
In Hargeisa we surveyed Nasahablood A and B which
both were open IDP settlements, houses are a mix of traditional, round, oval,
or rectangular structures with a frame of wooden sticks covered by pieces of
cardboard, sacks, plastic bags etc. and rectangular tin sheet structures with
tin roofs.
Whilst in Borame we surveyed Baade and Hayayabe
IDPS. One consisting of 215 houses built by UNHABITAT each house consisting of
one story housing units, with 3 rooms and a built up area of 10 x 9 meters (90
square meters) each, inclusive of a covered kitchen area, a pit latrine with
septic soak away pit, a water tank and an open court-yard with basic flooring
surrounded by a perimeter wall located at the dedicated resettlement area.
2.4
Issues related to land ownership in IDP settlements
The questions on issues related to landownership
in the IDP settlements and relationship with land owner and host community was
more prevalent in Hargeisa IPD’s where the land settlement is privately owned.
The private land owners have given notices to both government and IDP’s to
vacate the land. They have also instructed that no permanent structures can be
built such as sanitation, health, and education facilities thereby making it
difficult for agency interventions unless the government provides them land.
The government has made numerous pledges to provide government land have not
done so for the past seven years.
3
DISPLACEMENT ISSUES
3.1
Place of origin
The households were asked to give their place of
origin by region and district. IDP’s in Hargeisa mostly originated from
Ethiopia, rural areas of M/eeh region, and Moqdisho whereas in Borama most
originated from Ethiopia, Borama rural areeas, and host community. A fare
portion of the IDP inhabitants included people who’s livestock have been
eradicated by the recent re-occurring droughts.
3.3
Reasons for current displacement
The reasons for the current displacement rage from
droughts, conflict, and general violence.
4
ACCESSES TO BASIC SERVICES
4.1
Food
it was often highlighted that begging was the most
important source of income for the IDPs where some households performed low
income labor jobs such as construction, shoe mending, hair-cutting etc.
4.2
Water
The large majority of the IDP’s purchase water
through water trucking with most IDP’s not performig any water treatment. Of
the all respondents, a majority (80%) reported that they had equal access to
water if they could afford it.
4.3
Sanitation
Hargeisa IDP’s have no access to latries as the
settlemet accupies private land they cannot build any latrines. Women and girls
suffer the most and as a result developed health issues. During the day women
relief themselves inside the house using bowl and latter at night disposing
them outside. All IDP’s I Nasahablood A and B perform open defecation. Mostly
Borama IDP’s have latrines some private to each household and others sharing
latrines amongst households. The survey
did not provide information on availability or conditions of latrines but did
ask those
4.4
Education
The large majority (80%) of all IDP’s reported
that their children do not attend formal school. Where some (35%) only attend
informal education. Biggest response for children not attendig school is the
lack of financial capability of parents.
4.5
Health
With all IDP’s there are no nearby MCH centers yet
70% of households require health care due to health issues. Pregnant women do
not have access to antenatal care nor do they receive postnatal care.
5
PROTECTION ISSUES
5.1
Eviction threats
In Hargeisa, eviction threats are real and very
much affecting the lives of the IDP’s appear
not to be an issue of concern. Only 192 respondents (4.8%) said they were
facing eviction threats and referred to conflict over landownership and
problems when living in government buildings or on government land . At the
time of the survey, it was expected that the government would soon move forward
with reclaiming government buildings, but most likely this was postponed due to
the escalating conflict in Mogadishu.
6
INTENTIONS FOR THE FUTURE
6.1
Wish to return
Of all the respondents (45.8%) expressed that they
would like to return while (54.2%) said they would not. Of those who would like
to return, practically everyone said that they wanted to go back to their place
of origin, while only 20% respondents specified that they wanted to go back to
a previous place of residence. Conditions for returning generally included – in
order of priority: physical safety, housing available, access to basic
services, after other households have returned first, and job opportunities
available.
6.2
Wish to stay or resettle
Of the 54.2% respondents who would like to remain
in current location, 78.3% said they would like to settle permanently while the
rest said they would stay for a period.
6.3
Priority Needs
·
Food
·
Shelter
·
WASH
·
Health
& Nutrition
·
School
·
Land
Emergency Wash Project Report
AFRICAN YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (AYODA) _____________________________________________________________________________ COMPILED REPORT FOR EMERGENCY WASH PROGRAM RESPONSE FOR 53,952 CYCLONE SAGAR AFFECTED PEOPLE IN AWDAL REGION SOMALILAND